Dishonest Medical Studies

• Dishonest Medical Studies
• One Possible Solution
• Medical Malfeasance
• But Wait - It Gets Worse

Dishonest Medical Studies

It has become more and more evident that many "Medical Studies" are skewed and even outright dishonest.

These results put many people lives at risk and even worse, it may dramatically affect their overall quality-of-life -- especially the elderly.

Companies (and individuals) which sponsor false media (online, TV, radio, print and any form of electronic communication) should be fined in the hundreds of millions of dollars (euros) for promoting false and often harmful disonformation.

This fine should be PER OUTLET which publishes their false narritive.

Lies, Damn Lies Snd Statistics↟↟

Mark Twain: "lies, damned lies, and statistics".

I could write hundreds of pages about Fake studies where Fraud is part of the course but I will let you do your own research here.

1. "Medical study fraud"
2. "BMJ medical study fraud"
3. "Peer to peer medical fraud"
4. "Elsevier medical study fraud"
5. "Excess covid vaccine death stats exposed"

One Possible Solution

This is an example of how you / we are being lied to without the actual "lie" itself being spoken - instead it is intimated - and this is so that most people will see the statement and react in a negative or positive manner to the statement.

Many study results are actually "False Flag" operations where the information posted (submitted) is deliberately designed to cast aspersions on a specific hern or plant, depending on the desired target outcome of the person or group posting the report or study.

"The Comfrey Lie" is a perfect example of this psychological fraud.

A classic case of these lies is the supposed study done on Comfrey where they did not even classify the actual variety the supposedly studied.

Nor did they mention the doses of Alkaloids given to baby rats was concentrated.

Did you know that drinking too much water can kill you - especially if you are diabetic or have kidney problems?

It is called "Water intoxication" and this often leads to Congestive Heart Failure (as I found out in 2023 - after I died twice).

The reason this affects diabetics is because your body craves more water to flush out the excess sugar you are ingesting.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Water_intoxication

PROBLEM 1 - Trigger Words ↟↟

You have a bunch of "Trigger Words" to look our for. These include (but are not limited to) the following:

• May
• Might
• Suggest
• More likely
• May create
• Has been shown
• Evidence suggests
• A study
• Findings suggest
• A potential trigger
• May develop symptoms
• A study ...
• Studies have also proposed

In a study comparing castor oil to sennosides, castor oil was more likely to cause abdominal cramping, vomiting, bloating, and dizziness.

Far fewer adverse effects occurred with the use of other laxatives.

Few studies have also proposed that long-term use of a stimulant laxative may create a cathartic colon due to anatomic changes.

However, more recent evidence suggests that a "cathartic colon" is not an actual condition.

Additionally, a study identified castor oil, often used in lip care products, as a potential trigger for allergic contact dermatitis.

Patients with sensitive skin who use castor oil-containing lip balms or glosses may develop symptoms like pruritus and erythema on the lips.

While not universally applicable, these findings suggest that some individuals are susceptible to allergic reactions to castor oil

PROBLEM 2 - Transparencies ↟↟

What are Transparencies?

Transparencies are background information which includes things like:

These are almost always missing or extremely limited in scope and in most cases, when Transparencies are supplied, they rarely (if ever) comprehensive.

1. FULL disclosure on "Who" funded the study?
2. Are they related to or have any connection with any pharmaceutical company, chemical company, bio-engineering company or any health related company?
3. How the study was conducted (Important).
4. Original number of test people (subjects)?
5. Final number of test subjects?
6. Symptoms or Side effects ANYONE in the group experienced? *A1
7. Reasons for anyone dropping out of the test?
8. Compared to which other studies? (Must show other study outcomes and proceedures)
9. Exact proceedure used. *A2
10. Any funding promised or delivered - directly or indirectly - to the institute, facility, University, Medical establishment or other location?
11. Any funding promised or delivered - directly or indirectly - to any member participating in the study - either staff, patients, test subjects or administrators?
12. EXACT Statistics and result Percentages. *A3
13. Complete health chart of "each" participants current dietary intake, supplement intake and how often each supplement is taken. *A4
14. Each participants current exercise regime including how often they actively exercise and when was the last time they did so.
15. What are the "directives and expectations" of the person or "company" paying for the test study?. *A5
16. For organic and herbal trials, what are the exact combinations used? *A6
17. etc

Symptoms or Side effects ANYONE in the group experienced.

This must be a comprehensive report on EACH and every individual. This is to stop "Cherry Picking" by removing sub-sets of people from the entire trial.

Removing "problem participants" is a VERY common practice in medical experimentation.

Those removed are rarely "if ever" reported in the final data sets.

Exact proceedure used.

This must be explicit in detail and severe penalties must be issued for fabrication of proceedures and results.

Statistics and result Percentages.

Often results are given in percentages and this can be seriously skewed especially when you incorporate Cherry Picking into the end results.

Also, 1 person equals 100% - and percentages do not tell you the number of people in the trial (unless specifically stated)

This is why it is important to clarify the exact number of people at the beginning of the trial and those remaining at the end of the trial.

Complete health chart of "each" participant.

2 Main Things will affect the results.

Given the epidemic of sugar and its affect on overall health, a complete health chart should be conducted on each participant.

Unhealthy eating habits (and all that includes).

Directives and expectations.

What are the "Directives and expectations" expected by the person or company funding the study?

I have seen many studies where results are "bent" to suit expections.

Exact combinations used.

This is very important because often there are tests and studies done with 1 "plant or herb etc" and the trial targets something specific which is not in that herbs capacity to "edit".

Also, many plants work better when combined with other plants and this is also rarely included in trials.

Medical Malfeasance

On top of that you have rampant for example:

1) 1930's X-raying womens wombs when they were pregnant which induced cancer in many babies.

2) Thalidomide

3) "Statin Drugs" Statin Drugs block the RAS-Protein which stimulates "NeuroGenesis".

"RAS-Protein" Stimulates NeuroGenesis.

4) The benefits of RAW Milk.

A2 Milk is better than A1 milk. ("US" ) + ("AU" ) + ("UK" )

Further reading

The Relation of Alimentation and Disease.

It Gets Worse

How can you trust a system that is literally paid for by direct and indirect bribe money?

I want you to think about how accurate AI will be when the inflow of information is controlled by sociopathic megalomaniacs with a complete disregard for suffering of others.

Pharmaceutical companies spend between $5 Billion and $7 Billion USD annually on direct-to-consumer (DTC) television advertising, providing a massive share of total TV station revenue.

And yet almost all of the meds they promote need a doctors prescription to obtain... Some poeple have called this indirect blackmail.

And then there is this (circa 2025).

• The pharmaceutical industry funds approximately 45% to 48% of the "FDA's" total annual budget, but it finances roughly 65% to 75% of the FDA's specific division that reviews human drugs.
  So no conflict there. <💀>
• The UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency ("MHRA" ) receives approximately 75% to 86% of its funding from the pharmaceutical industry depending on how the budget is analyzed.
  So no conflict there. <💀>
• The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration ("TGA" ) generates approximately 73% of its total funding directly from the therapeutic goods and pharmaceutical industry through a strict cost-recovery model. Historically, this figure has fluctuated between 73% and 94% depending on the specific financial year and additional short-term government grants.
  So no conflict there. <💀>
• Europe: Tell me if this smells off. For 2026, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has an overall budget of €615.5 million. Around 91.5% of this is derived directly from pharmaceutical companies through fees and charges levied for regulatory services, amounting to approximately €563.2 million.
• Canada: So the EU has a €615.5 million budget for 2026 while Canada has a $10,625,357,753 budget.

** The European Union has a total population of approximately 451 million inhabitants. (2026) "EU"

** Canada's population is approximately 41.4 million. (2026) "CA"

But wait, it actually gets even worse. You need to know how this will affect you and your family. "CIA Whistleblower"